The phrase Web 2.0 was originally coined three or so years ago and, unless you’ve been living on a far off planet or in a cave, no doubt you’ll have heard it. Perhaps you might have wondered what it is all about, or indeed, whether Web 2.0
actually exists at all?
It may seem a tiny strange to be asking whether something that people have been speaking about for three years exists or not, but the reason is that there is no easy-topin-down definition of what Web 2.0 actually is.
Indeed, a measure of just how difficult it is to define Web 2.0 is that it is far easier to tie down what it is not!
For example, it isn’t a particular type of website, even though some sites (especially world wide web marketing product sales pages produced over the last six months or so) are becoming recognizable as Web 2.0 ‘style’ sites.
More and more of these sites are moving away from strong, garish colors in sales page backgrounds and reverting to plain white or grey backgrounds.
Whilst these are not Web 2.0 sites – there is no such ting – nevertheless, simplicity and plainness in site design is making a big comeback!
The fact is that, if there is only one factor that can be said to represent Web 2.0, it can be summed up as interactivity.
Web 2.0 is all about the idea that people should have some kind of input to the sites that they are viewing, again perhaps best described by comparison with the ‘old’ style of websites back when we had what might be called Web 1.0.
Those old style sites tended to be static - you read them and then moved on. There was no requirement for you to do anything other than read and accept the information that the site gave you.
The essence of Web 2.0 is that sites that you are viewing will invite you to do something.
So, maybe when you go to a commercial website for a massive international company, the site asks you to leave comments of perhaps take a swift survey? They are asking you for feedback of some kind, whether it is on the story that you’ve just read, or about the site itself.
They’re asking you to interact with them.
Alternatively, Web 2.0 sites can be community sites where users join and then have the ability to create their own individuals pages or ‘spaces’ within the community.
Then they’ve the opportunity of inviting their friends to join too.
It can also be of sites that grant viewers to post photos, videos, sound bites, comments and questions.
Web 2.0 is also about blogs where info and feedback can be added to the sites. So, does Web 2.0 actually exist?
The answer is, who the heck knows or cares?
What clearly does exist is a movement to greater interactivity between sites and their viewers online. If that’s Web 2.0 or nor is really pretty irrelevant as far as I have the ability to see!
However, the problem that I see with Web 2.0 is that a lot of folks far wiser and more knowledgeable than me are telling us that it is an Internet ‘revolution’.
And, like all ‘revolutions’ the tendency has been to throw away everything from the old pre-revolution days, whether good or bad.
So it is that many of the things that worked well but that unfortunately represented Web 1.0 have been forgotten or swept under the carpet in the seemingly headlong rush to unquestioningly adopt everything that is Web 2.0.
Maybe this makes me sound like a Luddite or something, but one of my objectives on this website is to show that, alongside all the modern Web 2.0 ‘stuff’, it is still an idea to turn the clock back a little, to show how some aspects of what I am calling the Web 1.0 era still work, and work well.
In particular, I believe that a lot of very valid traffic generations techniques that worked back before Web 2.0 came along can still work pretty well today, especially when combined with some techniques and ideas that are usually categorized as representing Web 2.0.
So, in a nutshell, this book is all combining the ideal of the old and the new, taking what worked before and what is working now in terms of driving traffic to your site, and putting them together into one cohesive plan.
It is also going to attempt to look into the future too, where the market is going to, because some pointers to the future development of on the internet business and site traffic are already becoming fairly clear.
So, does Web 2.0 actually exist, or is it just a trendy phrase that was invented by a superb marketing specialist?
In my thought, I would state that the true answer to that’s, a bit of both!
I think that the reason that the phrase caught on is that it captures the imagination, and sounds fresh and exciting.
I also think it undeniable that interactivity is a feature of the net in a way that it certainly wasn’t three years ago.
But, just because something is fresh and new does not automatically mean that everything before is necessarily dull and stale, as this website will clearly demonstrate!
Discussion
No comments for “Web 2.0”
Post a comment (Do-Follow, please be wise !)